Vol. 1 (2023): Cuadernos de Derecho Regulario
Estudios I. Los retos de la movilidad urbana sostenible

Taxi y VTC como actores en la implementación y extensión de las Zonas de Bajas Emisiones (ZBE)

Tarrés, Marc
Universidad de Barcelona
Albalate, Daniel
Universidad de Barcelona
Fageda, Xavier
Universidad de Barcelona

Publicado 2024-01-04

Cómo citar

Tarrés, M., Albalate, D., & Fageda, X. (2024). Taxi y VTC como actores en la implementación y extensión de las Zonas de Bajas Emisiones (ZBE). Cuadernos De Derecho Regulatorio, 1, 137–193. https://doi.org/10.37417/cudere/vol_1_2023_2254


Sumario: 1. Introducción y antecedentes.—2. Análisis jurídico del nuevo marco regulatorio y recomendaciones para las regulaciones locales.—3. El papel de la oferta de servicios de movilidad bajo demanda en la sostenibilidad de la movilidad y su contribución a las zonas de bajas emisiones.—4. Conclusiones.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.


  1. Acheampong, R. A., Siiba, A., Okyere, D. K., Tuffour, J. P. (2020), «Mobility­on–demand: An empirical study of internet–based ridehailing adoption factors, travel characteristics and mode substitution effects», Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 115, 102638
  2. Albalate, D., Bel, G. (2009), «What local policy makers should know about urban road charging: lessons from worldwide experience», Public Administration Review, 962­975; Andersson, D., Nässén, J. (2016), «The Gothenburg congestion charge scheme: a pre–post analysis of commuting behavior and travel satisfaction», Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 82–89.
  3. Albalate, D., Fageda, X. (2021), «On the relationship between congestion and road safety in cities», Transport Policy, 105, 145–152.
  4. Alemi, F., Circella, G., Sperling, D. (2018), «Adoption of Uber and Lyft, Factors Limiting and/or Encouraging Their Use and Impacts on Other Travel Modes among Millennials and Gen Xers in California», Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., September 7–11.
  5. Alemi, F., Rodier, C. (2017), «Simulation of Ridesourcing Using Agent–Based Demand and Supply Regional Models: Potential Market Demand for First–Mile Transit Travel and Reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled in the San Francisco Bay Area», UC Davis Research Report. National Center for Sustainable Transportation, University of California, Davis, California.
  6. Anderson, D. N. (2014), «“Not just a taxi”? For–profit ridesharing, driver strategies, and VMT». Transportation, 41(5), 1099–1117.
  7. Anderson, M. L., Davis, L. W. (2021), Uber and Alcohol–Related Traffic Fatalities. Documento de trabajo.
  8. Babar, Y., Burtch, G. (2020), «Examining the heterogeneous impact of ride–hailing services on public transit use», Information Systems Research, 31 (3).
  9. Banister, D. (2008), «The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm», Transport Policy, vol. 15, núm. 2, pp.?73–80.
  10. Barahona, N., Gallego, F. A., Montero, J. P., «Vintage–Specific Driving Restrictions», The Review of Economic Studies, 87(4), pp.?1646–1682.
  11. Barnes, S. J., Guo, Y., Borgo, R. (2020), «Sharing the air: Transient impacts of ride–hailing introduction on pollution in China», Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, p.?102434.
  12. Barreto, Y., Neto, R. S., Carazza, L. (2021), Uber and Traffic Safety: Evidence from Brazilian Cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 123, 103347.
  13. Barrios, J. M., Hochberg, Y., Yi, H. (2020), The Cost of Convenience: Ridehailing and Traffic Fatalities. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3288802, Rochester, NY.
  14. Barth, M., Boriboonsomsin, K. (2008), «Real–world carbon dioxide impacts of traffic congestion», Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2058, 163­171.
  15. Bekka, A., Louvet, N., Adoue, F. (2020), «Impact of a ridesourcing service on car ownership and resulting effects on vehicle kilometers travelled in the Paris Region». Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8?(3), 1010–1018.
  16. Bennett, H., Zahler, A (2018), Comparación de los factores tecnología y regulación en los costos de los choferes de taxi y plataformas digitales tipo Uber.
  17. Berger, T., Chen, C., Frey, C. B. (2018), «Drivers of Disruption? Estimating the Uber Effect», European Economic Review 110: 197–210.
  18. Bernardo, V. (2022), The Impact of Bike–Sharing Systems on Congestion. Evidence from Euro- pean Urban Areas. Disponible en: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4027398.
  19. Bernardo, V., Fageda, X., Flores–Fillol, R. (2021), «Pollution and congestion in urban areas: The effects of low emission zones», Economics of Transportation, 26–27, art. 100221.
  20. Boisjoly, G., Grisé, E., Maguire, M., Veillette, M–P., Deboosere, R., et al. (2018), «Invest in the ride: A 14 year longitudinal analysis of the determinants of public transport ridership in 25 North American cities», Transportation Research Part A, 116, 434–445.
  21. Börjesson, M., Eliasson, J., Hugosson, M. B., Brundell–Freij, K. (2012), «The Stockholm congestion charges – 5 years on. Effects, acceptability and lessons learnt», Transport Policy, 20, 1–12.
  22. Brodeur, A., Nield, K. (2018), «An empirical analysis of taxi, Lyft and Uber rides: Evidence from weather shocks in NYC», Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 152: 1–16.
  23. Cairncross, J., Hall, J. H, Palsson, C. (2022), VancUber: The Effect of Ride–Hailing on Public Transportation, Congestion, and Traffic Fatalities, documento de trabajo, Universidad de Toronto.
  24. Cats, O., Kucharski, R., Danda, S. R. y Yap, M. (2022), «Beyond the dichotomy: How ride– hailing competes with and complements public transport», PLoS ONE 17(1): e0262496.
  25. Cesaroni, G., Boogaard, H., Jonkers, S., Porta, D., Badaloni, C., Cattani, G., Forastiere, F., Hoek, G. (2012), «Health benefits of traffic–related air pollution reduction in different socioeconomic groups: The effect of low–emission zoning in Rome». Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 69, 133–139.
  26. Chang, H–H. (2017), «The economic effects of Uber on taxi drivers in Taiwan». Journal of Competition Law & Economics13(3): 475–500.
  27. Chen, M. K., Sheldon, M. (2015), Dynamic Pricing in a Labor Market: Surge Pricing and Flexible Work on the Uber Platform
  28. Chen, X., Zheng, H., Wang, Z., Chen, X. (2021), «Exploring impacts of on­demand ridesplitting on mobility via real–world ridesourcing data and questionnaires». Transportation, 4, 1541– 1561.
  29. Clewlow, R. R., Mishra, G. S., (2017), «Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride–Hailing in the United States», Publication UCD-ITS- RR-17-07. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, California.
  30. Cohen, P., Hahn, R., Hall, J., Levitt, S., Metcalfe, R. (2016), «Using Big Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber», NBER Working Papers 22627, 1–42.
  31. COM (2018), 330 final. Disponible en: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?- uri=CELEX:52018DC0330.
  32. Contreras, S. D., Paz, A. (2018), «The effects of ride–hailing companies on the taxicab industry in Las Vegas, Nevada». Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice 115: 63–70
  33. Cooper, G., Howe, D., Mye, P. (2000), The Missing Link: An Evaluation of Carsharing Portland Inc. Oregon, Department of Environmental Quality, Portland.
  34. Cramer, J. (2016), The Effect of Uber on the Wages of Taxi and Limousine Drivers. Unpublished results;
  35. Cramer, J., Krueger, A. B. (2016), «Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber», American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings: 106(5), 177­182
  36. De Borger, B., Mulalic, I., Rouwendal, J. (2016), «Substitution between cars within the household», Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 85, 135–156.
  37. Dills, A. K., Mulholland, S. E. (2018), Ride–sharing, fatal crashes, and crime. Southern Economic Journal, 84, 965–991.
  38. Doppelt, L. (2018), Need a Ride? Uber Can Take You (Away from Public Transportation). MPP Thesis, Washington, D. C., Georgetown University.
  39. Duranton, G., Turner, M.?A. (2011), «The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities». American Economic Review, 101 (6): 2616–52.
  40. Ellison, R. B., Greaves, S. P., Hensher, D. A. (2013), «Five years of London’s low emission zone: Effects on vehicle fleet composition and air quality». Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 23, Article 25–33.
  41. Erhardt, G. D., Mucci, R. A., Cooper, D., Sana, B., Chen, M., Castiglione, J. (2022), «Do transportation network companies increase or decrease transit ridership? Empirical evidence from San Francisco», Transportation, 49, 313–342.
  42. Erhardt, G. D., Roy, S., Cooper, D., Sana, B., Chen, M. y Castiglione, J. (2019), «Do transportation network companies decrease or increase congestion?», Science Advances 5(5).
  43. Erhardt, G. D., Roy, S., Cooper, D., Sana, B., Chen, M. y Castiglione, J. (2019), «Do transportation network companies decrease or increase congestion?», Science Advances 5(5); Henao, A., Marshall, W. E (2019), «The impact of ride­hailing on vehicle miles travelled», Transportation, 46, 2173–2194.
  44. European Commission (2017), Treatment of logistics activities in Urban Vehicle Access Regulation Scheme. Disponible en: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/324dd5/165603.pdf.
  45. Fageda, X. (2021), «Measuring the impact of ride–hailing firms on urban congestion: The case of Uber in Europe», Papers in Regional Science, 100 (5), 1230–1253.
  46. Feigon, S., Murphy, C (2016), «Shared Mobility and the Transformation of Public Transit», TCRP, Research Report 188. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press.
  47. Feigon, S., Murphy, C. (2018), Broadening Understanding of the Interplay Between Public Transit, Shared Mobility, and Personal Automobiles. TCRP, Research Re- port 195. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press.
  48. Flor M, Ortuño A., Guirao B. (2022), Ride–hailing services: Competition or complement to public transport to reduce accident rates. The case of Madrid. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:951258.
  49. Flor, M., Ortuño, A., and Guirao, B. (2022), Does the implementation of ride–hailing services affect urban road safety? The experience of Madrid. International Journal of Enrivonmental Research and Public Health, 19, 3078.
  50. Flor, M.; Ortuño, A.; Guirao, B.; Casares, J. (2021), Analysis of the Impact of Ride–Hailing Services on Motor Vehicles Crashes in Madrid. Sustainability, 13, 5855.
  51. Gehrke, S. R., Felix, A., Reardon, T. G. (2019), «Substitution of ride–hailing services for more sustainable travel options in the greater Boston region», Transportation Research Record, 2673 (1), 438–446.
  52. Gibson, M., Carnovale, M. (2015), «The effects of road pricing on driver behavior and air pollution», Journal of Urban Economics, 89, 62–73,
  53. Gonzalez, J.?N., Gomez, J., Vassallo, J.?M. (2022), «Do urban parking restrictions and Low Emissions Zones encourage a greener mobility?», Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 107, Article 103319.
  54. Grahn, R., Qian, S., Matthews, H. S., Hendrickson, C. (2021), «Are travelers substituting between transportation network companies (TNC) and public buses? A case study in Pittsburgh»; Transportation, 48, 977–1005.
  55. Greenwood, B. N., Wattal, S. (2017), Show me the way to go home: an empirical investigation of ride–sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle fatalities. MIS Q., 41, 163–187
  56. Hall, J. D., Palsson, C., Price, J. (2018), «Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?», Journal of Urban Economics, 108, 36–50.
  57. Hamilton, T. L. y Wich man, C. J. (2018), «Bicycle infrastructure and traffic congestion: Evidence from DC’s Capital Bikeshare» Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 87, 72–93.
  58. Henao, A. (2017), Impacts of Ridesourcing–Lyft and Uber–on Transportation Including VMT, Mode Replace- ment, Parking, and Travel Behavior. PhD diss., University of Colorado at Denver.
  59. Henao, A., Marshall, W. E (2019), «The impact of ride­hailing on vehicle miles travelled», Transportation, 46, 2173–2194.
  60. Jenn, A. (2020), «Emissions benefits of electric vehicles in Uber and Lyft ride–hailing services». Nature Energy, 5, 520–525.
  61. Katzev, R. (2003), «Car sharing: a new approach to urban transportation problems», Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 65–86
  62. Kirk, D. S., Cavalli, N., Brazil, N. (2020), The implications of ridehailing for risky driving and road accident injuries and fatalities. Social Sciences and Medicine, 250, 112793.
  63. Kong, H., Zhang, X., Zhao, J. (2020), «How does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China», Journal of Transport Geography, 86, 102769.
  64. Kong, H., Zhang, X., Zhao, J. (2020), «Is ridesourcing more efficient than taxis?», Applied Geography, 125, 102301.
  65. Krishnamurthy, C. y Ngo, N. (2021), «Transportation Network Companies Worsen Congestion and Air Quality? Evidence from Uber in California», CERE Working Papers, No 2021:18
  66. Lagos, V., Muñoz, Á., Zulehner, C. (2019), Gender–Specific benefits from Ride–Hailing Apps: evidence from Uber’s entry in Chile. Disponible en SSRN3370411 (https://ssrn. com/abstract=3370411 ).
  67. Lane, C.: (2005), «PhillyCarShare: first–year social and mobility impacts of carsharing in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania», Transportation Research Record, 1927(1), 158–166.
  68. Li, W., Shalaby, A., Habib, K. N. (2022), «Exploring the correlation between ride­hailing and multimodal transit ridership in Toronto», Transportation, 49, 765–789.
  69. Li, Z., Hong, Y., Zhang, Z. (2016), Do On–demand Ride–sharing Services Affect Traffic Conges- tion? Evidence from Uber Entry. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2838043.
  70. Malalgoda, N. y Hoon Lim, S. (2019), «Do transportation network companies reduce public transit use in the U. S.?», Trans- portation Research Part A, 130, 351–372.
  71. Martin, E. W., Shaheen, S. A. (2011), «Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America», IEEE Transport In- telligent. Transport System, 12(4), 1074–1086.
  72. Martin, E., Shaheen, S. A., Lidicker, J. (2010), «Impact of carsharing on household vehicle holdings: results from North American shared–use vehicle survey», Transportation Research Record, 2143(1), 150–158.
  73. Montoro, M.?J., «Ordenanza relativa a la Zona de Bajas Emisiones para preservar la calidad del aire en la ciudad de Barcelona. Análisis del instrumento ambiental, reflexión sobre el alcance de las restricciones impuestas y consideraciones sobre las sentencias del Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña, de 21 de marzo de 2022», en Cuadernos de Derecho Regulatorio, Vol. 1, 2023.
  74. Morrison, C. N., Jacoby, S. F., Dong, B., Delgado, M. K., Wiebe, D. J. (2018), Ridesharing and motor vehicle crashes in 4U. S. cities: an interrupted time–series analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 187, 224–232.
  75. Nelson, E., Sadowsky, N. (2019), «Estimating the Impact of Ride–Hailing App Company Entry on Public Transportation Use in Major US Urban Areas». The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 19, 1–21.
  76. Nie, Y. M. (2017), «How can the taxi industry survive the tide of ridesourcing? Evidence from Shenzhen, China». Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 79: 242–256
  77. Pang, J., Shen, S. (2022), «Do ridesharing services cause traffic congestion?», Canadian Journal of Economics, en prensa.
  78. Panteliadis, P., Strak, M., Hoek, G., Weijers, E., van der Zee, S., Dijkema, M. (2014), «Implementation of a low emission zone and evaluation of effects on air quality by long–term monitoring». Atmospheric Environment, 86, 113–119.
  79. Parry, W. H., Walls, M., Harrington, W. (2007), «Automobile externalities and policies». Journal of Economic Literature 45, 373–399.
  80. Peters, J. F., Burguillo, M., Arranz, J.?M. (2021), «Low emission zones: Effects on alternative–fuel vehicle uptake and fleet CO2 emissions». Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 95, Article 102882.
  81. Poulhès, A., Proulhac, L. (2022), «The Paris Region low emission zone, a benefit shared with residents outside the zone». Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 98, Article 102977.
  82. Qian, X., Lei, T., Xue, J., Lei, Z., y Ukkusuri, S. V. (2020), «Impact of transportation network companies on urban congestion: Evidence from large–scale trajectory data», Sustainable Cities and Society 55, p.?102053.
  83. Rangel, T., Gonzalez, J. N., Gomez, J., Romero, F., Vassallo, J. M. (2022), «Exploring ride­hailing fares: an empirical analysis of the case of Madrid». Transportation, 49, 373–393.
  84. Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R. y Shaheen, S. (2016), «Just a better taxi? A survey–based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco», Transport Policy, 45, 68–178.
  85. Rodier, C. (2018), «The effects of ride hailing services on travel and associated greenhouse gas emissions», Natio- nal Center for Sustainable Transportation, February 2019, University of California, Davis, California.
  86. Ryden, C., Morin, E.(2005), «Mobility services for urban sustainability: environmental assessment», Moses Report WP6, Trivector Traffic AB, Stockholm.
  87. Salas, R., Perez–Villadoniga, M. J., Prieto–Rodriguez, J., Russo, A. (2021), «Were traffic restrictions in Madrid effective at reducing NO2 levels?», Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 91, Article 102689.
  88. Santos, G., Fraser, G. (2006), «Road pricing: Lesson from London», Economic Policy, 21, 263–310.
  89. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M. (2014), «The reasons for the recent decline in young driver licensing in the United States», Traffic Inj. Prev. 15, 6–9.
  90. Scholl, L., Bedoya, F., Sabogal–Cardona, O., Oviedo, D. (2022), «Making the links between ride–hailing and public transit ridership: Impacts in medium and large Colombian cities», Re- search in Transportation Business & Management, 45, 100901.
  91. Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P. (2008), «Worldwide carsharing growth: an international comparison», UCD­ITSRR­08­10, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, California.
  92. Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P. (2013). «Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends», International Journal of sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 5–34
  93. Shaheen, S. A., Meyn, M. A., Wipyewski, K. (2003), «US shared–use vehicle survey findings on carsharing and station car growth: obstacles and opportunities», Transportation Research Record 1841(1), 90–98
  94. Shaheen, S. A., Schwartz, A., Wipyewski, K. (2004), «Policy considerations for carsharing and station cars: monitoring growth, trends, and overall impacts», Transportation Research Record, 1887(1), 128–136
  95. Shaheen, S., Wright, J., Dick, D., Novick, L. (2000), «Carlink: a smart carsharing system. Field Test Report», UCDITS-RR-00-4, University of California, Davis, California.
  96. Sui, Y., Zhang, H., Song, X., Shao, F., Yu, X., Shibasaki, R., Sun, R., Yuan, M., Wang, C., Li, S., Li, Y. (2019), «GPS data in urban online ride–hailing: A comparative analysis on fuel consumption and emissions». Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 495–505.
  97. Tarduno, M. (2021), «The Congestion Costs of Uber and Lyft», Journal of Urban Economics, 122, p.?103318.
  98. Tarrés, M. (2021), «Hacia una movilidad urbana sostenible, inteligente e inclusiva», en La Agenda 2030. Implicaciones y retos para las administraciones locales, FDGL, pp.?121 y ss.
  99. Tarrés, M. (2021), «Los servicios de plataforma: entre la innovación tecnológica y el interés general. El ejemplo de los servicios de movilidad», en Arroyo, Martínez, Rodríguez, Tarrés, Servicios en plataforma. Estrategias regulatorias, Derecho de los Servicios Públicos y de la Regulación–Marcial Pons.
  100. Tassinari, F. (2022), Low emission zones and traffic congestion: evidence from Madrid Central. Documento de trabajo, Universidad de Barcelona.
  101. Tikoudis, I., Martinez, L., Farrow, K., García–Bouyssou, C., Petrik, O., Oueslati, W. (2021), «Ridesharing services and urban transport CO2 emissions: Simulation–based evidence from 247 cities», Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 97, 102923.
  102. Tirachini, A. (2019), «Ride–hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review». Transportation, 47, 2011–2047.
  103. Wallsten, S. (2015), The Competitive Effects of the Sharing Economy: How is Uber Changing Taxis?
  104. Wang, M., Zhou, X. (2017), «Bike–sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities», Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 147–154.­
  105. Ward, J. W., Michalek, J., Azevedo, I. L., Samaras, C., Ferreira, P. (2019), «Effects of on– demand ridesourcing on vehicle ownership, fuel consumption, vehicle miles traveled, and emissions per capita in U. S. States». Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 108, 289–301.
  106. Wenzel, T., Rames, C., Kontou, E., Henao, A (2019), «Travel and energy implications of ridesourcing service in Austin, Texas». Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 70, 18–34.
  107. Wolff, H. (2014), «Keep your clunker in the suburb: Low emission zones an dadoption of green vehicles», The Economic Journal, 124(578), F481–F512.
  108. Yan, X., Levine, J., Zhao, X. (2019), «Integrating ridesourcing services with public transit: an evaluation of traveler responses combining revealed and stated preference data», Transportation Research C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 683–696.
  109. Young, M., Allen, J., Farber, S. (2020), «Measuring when Uber behaves as a substitute or supplement to transit: An examination of travel–time differences in Toronto», Journal of Transport Geo- graphy, 82, 102629.