Núm. 1 (2024)
Artículos

The sound of silence and the advocacy's forgotten role

PDF (English) HTML (English)
  • Massimiliano Bina
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2190

Publicado 2024-06-30

Cómo citar

Bina, M. (2024). The sound of silence and the advocacy’s forgotten role. Revista Ítalo-española De Derecho Procesal, (1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.37417/rivitsproc/2190

Derechos de autor 2024 Massimiliano Bina

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Resumen

This article discusses the old dictum nemo tenetur edere contra se from the point of view of lawyers, identifying ethical profiles in the presentation of evidence in relation to the professional secret and discussing the rationale of the lawyer's role who is entrusted with the task of selecting evidence, both in civil and common law systems.

 

PDF (English) HTML (English)

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Andrews N. (1994). Principles of Civil Procedure. Sweet & Maxwell.
  2. Baker J. (2018). Beyond the Information Age: The Duty of Technology Competence in the Algorithmic Society. South Carolina Law Review, 69, 1-24.
  3. Bentham J. (1838-1843). Rationale of Judicial. Evidence William Tait.
  4. Bertolino G. (2010). Giusto processo civile e verità. Contributo allo studio della relazione tra garanzie processuali e accertamento dei fatti nel processo civile. Giappichelli.
  5. Bianchi Riva R. (2012). L’avvocato non difenda causa ingiuste. Giuffrè.
  6. Borghesi D. (2008). Il segreto nella professione legale. In Rassegna Forense, 669-687.
  7. Buyle J.P., Van Gerven D. (2012). Le fondement et la portée du secret professionnel. Journal des Tribunaux, 327-330.
  8. Cachard O. (2006). Le secret de l’avocat en Europe. La Semaine Juridique - Edition générale, 11 octobre 2006.
  9. Calamandrei P. (1927). Linee fondamentali del processo civile inquisitorio. In Studi in onore di Giuseppe Chiovenda (pp. 131-171), Cedam.
  10. Calamandrei P. (1939). Il processo inquisitorio e il diritto civile. Giurisprudenza italiana, XCI, p.4, c. 237-246.
  11. Calamandrei P. (1950). Il processo come giuoco. Rivista di diritto processuale, p. I, 23-51.
  12. Calamandrei P. (1950). Processo e giustizia. Rivista di diritto processuale, p. I, 273-290.
  13. Consolo C. (2007). Postilla: … sed (e quando) magis amica veritas? Int’l Lis, p.45.
  14. Cruyplants J., Wagemans M. (2005). Secret professionnel et protection renforcée des échanges avocat/client. Journal des tribunaux, 565-574.
  15. Danovi R. (1993), Codice deontologico forense. I - Le norme deontologiche. Giuffrè.
  16. Dittrich L. (2019). La prova per testimoni. In L. Dittrich (dir.), Trattato Omnia. Diritto processuale civile (II, 1995-2070). Wolters Kluwer.
  17. Dondi A. (2012). Il diritto di esibizione – Struttura e singolarità dell’esibizione-discovery nelle controversie in materia di proprietà intellettuale. In A. Giussani, Il processo industriale (pp.233-240). Giappichelli.
  18. Dondi A. (2009). Segreti ed etica dell’avvocatura. Rilievi minimi in tema di law of lawyering e attorney-client privilege. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 651-665.
  19. Dondi A. (1997). Prova testimoniale. In Digesto discipline privatistiche, Sezione civile (vol. XVI, pp.40-64). Utet.
  20. Frankel M.E. (1982). The Search for Truth Continued: More Disclosure, Less Privilege. University of Colorado Law Review, 54, 51-66.
  21. Frostestad Kuehl H. (2019). Technologically competent: ethical practice for 21st century lawyering, Journal of law, technology & the internet, 10, 1-30;
  22. Gradi M. (2018). L’obbligo di verità delle parti. Giappichelli.
  23. Guttenberg J.A. (2012). Practicing law in the twenty-first century in a twentieth (nineteenth) century straightjacket: something has to give. Michigan State Law Review, 415-491.
  24. Hazard G.C. (1978). An Historical Perspective on the Attorney-Client Privilege. California law review, 66, 1061-1091.
  25. Hazard G.C. (1992). L’avvocato e l’etica professionale: gli aspetti giuridici. Foro italiano, V, c.215 ss.
  26. Hazard G.C., Dondi A. (2005). Etiche della professione legale. Il Mulino.
  27. Ho K. (2017). Defining the Contours of an Ethical Duty of Technological Competence. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 30, 853-872.
  28. Kaplow L., Shavell S. (1989). Legal Advice about Information to Present in Litigation: Its Effects and Social Desirability. Harvard Law Review, 102, 565-615.
  29. Krattenmaker T.G. (1963). Testimonial Privileges in Federal Courts: An Alternative to the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 62, 6-123.
  30. Lambert P. (1985), Le secret professionnel, Nemesis.
  31. Liebman E.T. (2012). Manuale di diritto processuale civile. Principi (8th ed.).. Giuffrè.
  32. Murphy A.M. (2005). Spin control and then high profile client-Should the attorney-client privilege extend to communication with public relations consultant. Syracuse Law Review, 55, 545-592.
  33. O’Brien E. (1842). The lawyer, his character and rule of holy life, after the manner of George Herbert’s country parson. William Pickering.
  34. Patterson L.R. (1981). The Function of a Code of Legal Ethics. University of Miami Law Review, 35, 695-726.
  35. Patterson L.R. (1987). An Inquiry into the Nature of Legal Ethics: The Relevance and Role of the Client. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 1, 43-84.
  36. Preston C.B. (2018). Lawyers’ Abuse of Technology. Cornell Law Review, 103, 879-976.
  37. Punzi C. (2009). Il «ministero» dell’avvocato. Rivista di diritto processuale, 589-598.
  38. Reali G. (2009). L’interrogatorio delle parti nel processo civile. Cacucci editore.
  39. Saltzburg S.A (1984). Corporate Attorney-Client Privilege in Shareholder Litigation and Similar Cases: Gamer Revisited. Hofstra Law Review, 12, 817-848.
  40. Scalfati A. (2004), Testimonianza e segreti nel processo penale (un’indagine su interessi in conflitto). Rivista di diritto processuale, 1235-1256.
  41. Scarselli G. (2010). Il nuovo art. 96, 3º comma, c.p.c.: consigli per l’uso. www.judicium.it, §3.
  42. Shuman D.W., Weiner M.S. (1982). The Privilege Study: An Empirical Examination of the Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege. North Carolina Law Review, 60, 893-942.
  43. St.Peter-Griffith A.M. (1993). Abusing the privilege: the crime fraud exception to Rule 501 of the Federal Rul of Evidence. University of Miami Law Review, 48, 259-289.
  44. Taruffo M. (2009). La semplice verità. Laterza.
  45. Taruffo M. (1988). Prova testimoniale (dir.proc.civ.). In Enciclopedia del diritto (vol.XXXVII, 729-758). Giuffrè.
  46. Vlies M. (2014). Le secret professionnel et le devoir de discrétion de l’avocat. In Liber amicorum Georges-Albert Dal (pp. 231-241). Larcier.
  47. Wendel W.B. (2016). Professional responsibility (5th ed). Wolters Kluwer.
  48. Wigmore J.H., McNaughton J.T. (1961). Evidence in trials at common law (4th ed.). Little, Brown.
  49. Wright C., Graham K. (1980). Federal practice and procedure: evidence. West Publishing.